OK< s I am late again with posting here. A new policy: I will post every Saturday, I am not always up to it on Friday.
Anyway, I was thinking about book covers. It sells the book, right? It probably does. So the writer is dependent of the artist. Probably not a good thing. Perhaps authors should make it themselves? Or at least to have a right to veto a horrible cover. Do they? I doubt it. In any book store, at leat 50% of covers are so bad one has to wonder what they were thinking. "They" refers to the artist/writer/publisher combo. Here are some outstandingly bad covers" http://www.goodshowsir.co.uk/. Enjoy. Or not.
Anyway, I was thinking about book covers. It sells the book, right? It probably does. So the writer is dependent of the artist. Probably not a good thing. Perhaps authors should make it themselves? Or at least to have a right to veto a horrible cover. Do they? I doubt it. In any book store, at leat 50% of covers are so bad one has to wonder what they were thinking. "They" refers to the artist/writer/publisher combo. Here are some outstandingly bad covers" http://www.goodshowsir.co.uk/. Enjoy. Or not.
RSS Feed